Archive for the ‘NCAA’ Category
College football guru Phil Steele has published his toughest schedules for 2009 in his annual College Football Preview.
Steele’s methodology differs from the NCAA’s own strength of schedule calculation in that it factors changes to the team for 2009. For example, Steele takes into account a variety of factors including number of starters returning per team, whereas the NCAA just looks at each team’s record from 2008 and projects it into this coming season. The difference? historically, is that Steele’s projections tend to be more accurate at this point in the season.
Without further ado….
PHIL STEELE’S 2009 TOUGHEST SCHEDULE RANKINGS
1. South Carolina
2. Florida St
3. Oklahoma
4. Mississippi St
5. Minnesota
6. Arkansas
7. Georgia
8. Virginia Tech
9. Tennessee
10. Michigan St
…
115. Ball St
116. Florida Atlantic
117. Boise St
118. Army
119. Ohio
120. Kent St
A couple of trends jump off the page right away:
First and foremost, the top ten is stacked with SEC East teams. Three big factors are at play here.
- The SEC returns an great percentage of starters almost across the board. There are a few key holes to fill, but no team is remotely close to starting from scratch.
- The SEC East scheduling in 2009 brings strong divisional matchups this season.
- And last but in no way least, the Florida Gators are hugely rated by Steele this season and six of the top ten teams have games scheduled against UF.
Secondly, if you’re Boise State, you not only have to win every game but you need to play some scoreboard pinball in order to make into a BCS game. The Broncos aren’t getting any help from their schedule this season.
Third, the WAC & MWC have broken the glass ceiling on the BCS, but don’t expect the MAC to join the party any time soon. Seven of the ten weakest schedules are from the MAC. Ouch.
Finally, and this might be the most important item to remember, Phil Steele’s rankings have been a good predictor but they don’t factor into the BCS in any way. The BCS has its own strength of schedule component within the computer indexes.
© www.fanblogs.com
On the day after Congress held hearings on swine flu, a House subcommittee set out to investigate the Bowl Championship Series. The results? Congressional leaders proved they know very little about college football, and even less about the BCS.
The House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection hosted the hearings. Of the twenty-nine House members on the committee, three showed up to participate
The hearing leader, Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), introduced the key guest, BCS coordinator John Swofford, as the commissioner of the Athletic Coast Conference. Rep. Rush, I pretty sure it’s the Atlantic Coast Conference, although they do play athletics, so I guess we’ll give you partial credit, Congressman.
Craig Thompson was introduced as the commissioner of the West Mountain. Seriously? The West Mountain? Is Thompson the chief ski lift operator there or something? Could someone not point out to the leader of the BCS committee hearing that MWC is an acronym for the Mountain West Conference and not West Mountain?
None of the congressmen attending the hearing was aware that all eleven major conferences are members and financial benefactors of the BCS.
I mean… seriously… is this how our congressmen prepare for an on-the-record House hearing? I cringe to think what would happen if the discussion was the future of medicare. In the words of Britney Spears, “Ding dang, y’all!”
Rep Joe Barton (R-Tex.), an outspoken advocate for scapping the BCS in favor of a playoff format, demonstrated his grasp of playoff proposals by insisting that a March Madness style bracket format may be the solution for college football.
“You could have a playoff system with 64 teams, and use every bowl that’s currently in there,” Barton said Friday. “You could do that.”
No you couldn’t.
“We’d still be playing,” Alamo Bowl CEO Derrick Fox quipped.
Congressman, if 64 teams are play in a single-elimination format… then it takes 63 total games to determine the winner. That’s how it works.
Barton has proposed legislation that would forbid the BCS from awarding a “national championship” trophy. Within the bill, any organization would be barred from “the marketing, promotion, and advertising of a postseason game as a ‘national championship’ football game, unless it is the result of a playoff system. Violations of the prohibition will be treated as violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act as an unfair or deceptive act or practice.”
Let me see if I understand the implication: Since the BCS does not award a National Championship trophy… the BCS would continue unchanged. Yep. The American Football Coaches Association would still hand out the Coaches Trophy. The AP would still crown its own champion as well. In other words, Barton’s legislation would permit the BCS to continue unchanged.
So… Barton’s bill means nothing to the BCS… at all? Well, yeah. Congressman Barton told Swofford during the hearing that the BCS wouldn’t be obligated to institute any change.
“You don’t have to change it. Our bill doesn’t say you have to change it.”
(That said… I would still love for someone to start handing out the “Barton Cup”.)
Later Barton — who’s bill was the entire basis for the hearings — left the committee meeting to catch a flight home.
Now maybe it’s just me, but when you introduce a bill to change the BCS… that you GO OUT OF YOUR WAY to explain will not change the BCS… and then you leave your own hearing to fly home… I’m going to have a hard time taking you seriously. Maybe it’s just me.
Rep. Rush went on to ask the Athletic Conference and West Mountain conference commissioners if they believed the current BCS system was fair. Thompson stated that the current system was “grossly inequitable.” Swofford said that the revenue distribution “represents the marketplace”, which is really just a nice way of saying some BCS teams are drawing 70,000+… for their spring practice games. Blutarsky points out that Georgia drew 42,458… which would have ranked them 54th in attendance last season (pdf!), just ahead of… UTAH!
Was Thompson hoping for a federal bailout with the “grossly inequitable” comment? Seriously, man… some of your schools don’t even offer ESPN on campus cable networks??
But Thompson got in his own polite comment when asked if he believed Congress should intervene in the BCS.
“The U.S. Congress represents fans and constituencies,” Thompson said. “Our university presidents work with that same group of constituents.”
In other words, they guy who is paying lobbyists to push for an eight-team playoff would kindly like Congress to mind its own business and stay out of college football.
Well said, Commissioner. Well said.
The full hearing is posted online at CSpan, but — I’m warning you — regardless of where you stand on this one, you’re probably going to hate yourself for enduring this.
© www.fanblogs.com
Comment on Congressional hearings on BCS prove to be a joke…
Looking to follow the tweets of your team’s college football coach on Twitter? Here’s a directory list of twitter accounts for NCAA football coaches who use Twitter.
College Football Coaches who Twitter
ACC Coaches
@DavidCutcliffe – Duke Blue Devils Football Coach David Cutcliffe
@CoachSwinney” – Clemson Tigers Football Coach Dabo Swinney
@ CoachFridge” – Maryland Terrapins Football Coach Ralph Friedgen
Big East Coaches
@CoachStewart – West Virginia Mountaineers Football Coach Bill Stewart
@jimleavitt – University of South Florida Bulls Football Coach Jim Leavitt
@dougmarrone – Syracuse Orange Football Coach Doug Marrone
@coachwannstedt – Pitt Panthers Football Coach Dave Wannstedt
SEC Coaches
@CoachUrbanMeyer – Florida Gators Football Coach Urban Meyer
@LSUCoachMiles – LSU Tigers Football Coach Les Miles
@LaneKiffinUT – Tennessee Volunteers Football Coach Lane Kiffin
@rollwiththetide – University of Alabama Crimson Tide Football Coaches (collectively)
@MarkRicht - Georgia Bulldogs Football Coach Mark Richt
Big10 Coaches
@Play4brew – Minnesota Gophers Football Coach Tim Brewster
@RonZook – Illinois Illini Football Coach Ron Zook
@UM_CoachRod – Michigan Wolverines Football Coach Rich Rodriguez
@JayPaterno – Penn State University Nittany Lions Assistant Football Coach Jay Paterno
@BretBielema – Wisconsin Badgers Football Coach Bret Bielema
Big12 Coaches
@BoPelini – Nebraska Cornhuskers Football Coach Bo Pelini
@mizzoufootball – Missouri Tigers Football Coach Gary Pinkel
@CoachSherman – Texas A&M Aggies Football Coach Mike Sherman
Pac10 Coaches
@CoachSark – Washington Huskies Football Coach Steve Sarkisian
@PeteCarroll – USC Trojans Football Coach Pete Carroll
@CoachWulff – Washington State University Cougars Football Coach Paul Wulff
@JimHarbaugh – Stanford Cardinal Football Coach Jim Harbaugh
MAC Coaches
@coachbeckman – Toledo Rockets Football Coach Tim Beckman
@ron_english – Eastern Michigan Football Coach Ron English
@TUCoachAlGolden – Temple Owls Football Coach Al Golden
Conference USA Coaches
@CoachFedora – Southern Miss Football Coach Larry Fedora
@UCFFootball – University of Central Florida Football Coaches (collectively)
@CoachCollins – University of Central Florida Knights Assistant Football Coach Geoff Collins
@CoachSnyder – Marshall University Thundering Herd Football Coach Mark Snyder
Mountain West Conference Coaches
@KyleWhittingham – Utah Utes Football Coach Kyle Whittingham
@Cowboysfootball – Wyoming Cowboys Football Coach Dave Christensen
@CoachFairchild – Colorado State Rams Football Coach Steve Fairchild
@Coachlocks – New Mexico Lobos Football Coach Mike Locksley
Sun Belt Conference Coaches
@coachdavidelson – Western Kentucky Hilltoppers Football Coach David Elson
Independent Coaches
@NDHFC – Notre Dame Football Coach Charlie Weis
Know of other college football coaches who use Twitter? Send us a tweet @fanblogs!
© www.fanblogs.com
The ESPN bloggers are getting into the St. Patrick’s Day spirit by breaking down the least experienced units in college football. Some highlights below, with links to the full reviews….
BYU offensive line: The Cougars will have to fill four of the five starting spots on the offensive line, but do have some depth there since several players received playing time due to injuries and some shuffling last year.
Boise State wide receivers: Boise State lost its three starting receivers, including Jeremy Childs, who left early for the NFL. Childs led the team in receiving yards and receptions last year and now quarterback Kellen Moore is going to have to break in some new playmakers.
Louisville: The biggest bunch of newbies are at quarterback, where there are four candidates for the job but not one who’s seen any significant playing time at this level.
South Florida: Look no farther than the offensive line, where four of five starters need to be replaced.
Oklahoma offensive line: The departure of starting center Jon Cooper, tackle Phil Loadholt and guards Duke Robinson and Brandon Walker means that Sam Bradford will have an inexperienced group protecting him next season. Trent Williams moves to left tackle and Bob Stoops likes his incoming talent, if not its early work habits.
Texas defensive line: The major question dogging the Longhorns’ national title hopes will be rebuilding a defensive front that loses All-American defensive end Brian Orakpo, defensive tackle Roy Miller, defensive tackleAaron Lewis and defensive end Henry Melton from last season.
Texas Tech offensive line: New quarterback Taylor Potts will be relying on a retooled offensive line protecting his blind side after left tackle Rylan Reed, left guard Louis Vasquez and center Stephen Hamby all departed from last year.
Alabama: The Crimson Tide are replacing three-year starter John Parker Wilson at quarterback, but losing the threesome of Andre Smith, Marlon Davis and Antoine Caldwell on the offensive line leaves the biggest void. They were at the crux of just about everything Alabama did on offense last season.
Georgia: Much of the focus this spring will be on Joe Cox and the quarterback position, but the Bulldogs’ most glaring weakness is the lack of a dominant pass-rusher from the defensive end position. They’ve got to find somebody who can consistently get to the quarterback.
LSU: Jordan Jefferson started the final two games at quarterback last season as a true freshman and enters 2009 as the favorite to win the job. His main competition will come from another true freshman, Russell Shepard, who graduated early and is going through spring practice.
GEORGIA TECH — Having lost three of four starters on the defensive line, it’s easily one of the greenest groups in the whole conference.
MIAMI – The Canes are still young everywhere, but remember quarterback Jacory Harris has only started two games and his backups have no collegiate experience.
NORTH CAROLINA — The Tar Heels lost their top three receivers and will be counting heavily on inexperienced players to replace Hakeem Nicks, Brandon Tate and Brooks Foster.
Arizona State — QB: Combined starts of the five candidates to replace Rudy Carpenter at quarterback? Zero.
Oregon – DT: Both starting defensive tackles are gone and this unofficial depth chart shows 14 combine tackles for seven potential replacements.
Oregon State — DE: Sackmasters Victor Butler and Slade Norris and their 41.5 combined sacks over the past two seasons are gone. Sophomore Kevin Frahm and senior Ben Terry, who split two sacks between themselves in 2008, are in.
Ohio State’s offensive line — Don’t be shocked if Ohio State enters 2009 with three sophomores (Mike Brewster, Mike Adams, J.B. Shugarts) and a transfer (Justin Boren) on its starting line.
Penn State’s defensive ends — Jerome Hayes should be back from another knee injury, but Penn State will be on the lookout for a proven pass rusher after losing Aaron Maybin, Maurice Evans and Josh Gaines.
Purdue’s wide receivers — New coach Danny Hope made wide receiver a peak priority in his first recruiting class after losing Greg Orton and Desmond Tardy, who combined for 136 receptions and 1,596 yards last year.
Wisconsin’s defensive line — The Badgers lose three multiyear starters (Matt Shaughnessy, Mike Newkirk and Jason Chapman) and don’t return many proven players aside from ends O’Brien Schofield and Dan Moore.
And — of course — everyone’s favorite green unit:
© www.fanblogs.com
ESPN has taken the lead in trying to rank the most prestigious college football programs since the inception of the AP poll in a psuedo-scientific fashion. It’s really more of a “which current FBS programs have lived in the spotlight” list, because it doesn’t take into account teams that aren’t currently in FBS and doesn’t attempt to match them one versus the other, per se.
First, the method to their madness:
ESPN’s Prestige Rankings are a numerical method of ranking the best FBS college football programs since the 1936 season. Point values were assigned for certain successes (win a national title, earn 25 points) and failures (get your program banned from the postseason, lose two points). The research department ran all the numbers through the computer to come up with the No. 1 program (and Nos. 2 to 119) of the past 73 seasons.
The full breakdown of how points were accumulated (and deducted) is online as well, with the “biggies” being National Championships, major bowl berths, major bowl wins, Heisman winners, and points for various finishes in the AP top twenty five poll.
The results are… pretty interesting. In fact, it’s really hard for me to quibble over all but a few positions – and even that might be subjective.
ESPN COLLEGE FOOTBALL PRESTIGE RANKINGS
1. Oklahoma
2. USC
3. Ohio State
4. Notre Dame
5. Nebraska
6. Alabama
7. Texas
8. Michigan
9. Florida State
10. Miami
11. Penn State
12. Tennessee
13. LSU
14, Georgia
15. Florida
16. UCLA
17. Washington
18. Georgia Tech
19. Arkansas
20. Texas A&M
21. Auburn
22t. Clemson
22t. Colorado
24. Ole Miss
25. BYU
Click here for positions 26 – 119
Again, this is more of a prestige spotlight list than a comparison of team A versus team B. That’s obvious when you look at the criteria, and then also compare the rankings above with head-to-head records, for example. Case(s) in point… Oklahoma has a losing record all-time against Texas, but is ranked ahead in prestige. Florida State has a losing record all-time against both Miami and Florida, but gets the presige nod. The Noles have a winning record over both top five Notre Dame and Ohio State, but I digress.
Even still, it’s hard for me to look back at the history of college football and not put the Sooners at or near the top of the list. Certainly Ohio State, USC, Notre Dame, and Nebraska all deserve to be near the top as well. You can debate where everyone falls (ie should “x” be #6,#7, or #8) but it’s hard to see someone in the top 25 that doesn’t belong.
© www.fanblogs.com
Comment on What are the most prestigious college football programs?…
The good folks at ESPN’s data center have the updates on which college football underclassmen are leaving school in search of huge bags of money a career in the NFL. Here’s the updated list, with a few notable talents highlighted.
Asher Allen CB 5-1 198 Georgia
Chris Baker DT 6-2 298 Hampton
Kenny Britt WR 6-4 215 Rutgers
Eben Britton OT 6-5½ 310 Arizona
Donald Brown RB 5-10 210 Connecticut
Everette Brown DE 6-4 252 Florida State
James Casey TE 6-4 245 Rice
Jeremy Childs WR 6-0 196 Boise State
Glen Coffee RB 6-1 198 Alabama
Austin Collie WR 6-2 206 BYU
Emanuel Cook S 5-10 203 South Carolina
Jared Cook TE 6-5 243 South Carolina
Michael Crabtree WR 6-3 214 Texas Tech
Andrew Davie TE 6-5 266 Arkansas
Nate Davis QB 6-1¾ 217 Ball State
Vontae Davis CB 5-11⅞ 203 Illinois
Josh Freeman QB 6-5½ 238 Kansas State
Shonn Green RB 5-10¾ 233 Iowa
Percy Harvin WR 5-10¾ 187 Florida
Darrius Heyward-Bey WR 6-1⅞ 203 Maryland
P.J. Hill RB 5-11 236 Wisconsin
Greg Isdaner OG 6-4 322 West Virginia
Ricky Jean-Francois DL 6-3 289 LSU
Paul Kruger DE 6-5 265 Utah
Jeremy Maclin WR 6-0 198 Missouri
Sen’Derrick Marks DT 6-0⅞ 289 Auburn
Aaron Maybin DE 6-3½ 250 Penn State
LeSean McCoy RB 5-11 205 Pittsburgh
Gerald McRath LB 6-3 220 Southern Miss
D.J. Moore CB 5-10 184 Vanderbilt
Knowshon Moreno RB 5-10¾ 207 Georgia
Captain Munnerlyn CB 5-9 185 South Carolina
Hakeem Nicks WR 6-1 215 North Carolina
Kevin Ogletree WR 6-2 189 Virginia
Jerraud Powers CB 5-9 191 Auburn
Mark Sanchez QB 6-2½ 225 USC
Andre Smith DT 6-4⅞ 341 Alabama
Sean Smith CB 6-2½ 212 Utah
Matthew Stafford QB 6-2½ 235 Georgia
Brandon Williams DE 6-5 246 Texas Tech
Chris “Beanie” Wells RB 6-1 235 Ohio State
Of course, it’s worth mentioning a few standout players who are not going pro this year:
Tim Tebow, QB, Florida
Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma
Colt McCoy, QB, Texas
Jermaine Gresham, TE, Oklahoma
Brandon Spikes, LB, Florida
C.J. Spiller, RB, Clemson
Greg Hardy, DE, Mississippi
Equally notable, FSU S Myron Rolle will leave the Noles, but isn’t going to the NFL… yet. Rolle accepted a Rhodes Scholarship and will study medical anthropology at Oxford. Rolle was expected to be a top 50 or better pick, but will instead look to enter the 2010 NFL draft.
The NFL Draft is scheduled for April 26th and 27th in New York City.
© www.fanblogs.com
While memories of Tebow hoisting the trophy may still be dancing through your head, the pundits can’t help but look ahead to the 2009-2010 BCS National Championship.
With more returning starters than USC or Oklahoma, the early favorites of the talking heads are the Florida Gators and Texas Longhorns.
Here’s a breakdown of the pundit pre-pre-preseason projections, with click-through links to their full lists.
Rivals.com
1. Florida
2. Texas
3. USC
4. Oklahoma
5. LSU
Highest Projected non-BCS: #9 – Boise State
Mark Schlabach (ESPN)
1. Florida
2. Texas
3. USC
4. Oklahoma
5. Alabama
Highest Projected non-BCS: #8 – Boise State
Dennis Dodd (CBS Sportsline)
1. Florida
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas
4. Alabama
5. Virginia Tech
Highest Projected non-BCS: #15 – Utah
Mr. College Football Tony Barnhart (Atlanta Constitution-Journal)
1. Florida
2. Texas
3. USC
4. Alabama
5. Oklahoma
Highest Projected non-BCS: #17 – TCU
Bruce Feldman (ESPN)
1. Florida
2. Texas
3. Oklahoma
4. Oregon
5. Virginia Tech
Highest Projected non-BCS: None in Top 10
Matt Hayes (Sporting News)
1. Florida
2. Texas
3. Oklahoma
4. Alabama
5. Ole Miss
Highest Projected non-BCS: #18 – BYU
So… if you believe the pundits… go ahead and book your reservations now, Gator & Longhorn fans. But… then again, that didn’t work out too well for Georgia fans last year, so… maybe just watch the games, first.
PS – On a side note, let me just say that I am glad to be back in the saddle. It’s nice to see the community has grown to the point where our contributors have taken over with amazing, self-generated content. Keep these great posts coming because… there is no off-season, boys.
© www.fanblogs.com
Comment on Who will be the 2009-2010 BCS National Champion?…
First and foremost, I need to offer up a confession. The last time I spit out my bowl game predictions – they stunk. Those things reeked worse than LSU’s and Texas Tech’s defense combined. Bad. Awful. Sorry, even.
But… the past is the past. THIS time, I think I got it right. (And I don’t have any teams playing in more than one bowl!)
So… without further ado… my updated bowl game projections for games played through November 22, 2008.
Click here for the complete 2008-2009 College Football Bowl Game Schedule
BCS National Championship Game – Florida vs Oklahoma
Fiesta Bowl – Texas vs USC
Rose Bowl – Oregon State vs Penn State
Sugar Bowl – Alabama vs Utah
Orange Bowl – Boston College vs Cincinnati
New Mexico – Colorado State vs. Nevada
St. Petersburg – Rutgers vs. Memphis
Las Vegas – BYU vs. Arizona
EagleBank – Clemson vs Navy
New Orleans – Southern Miss vs Troy
Poinsettia – TCU vs Fresno State*
Hawaii – Hawaii vs Western Michigan*
Motor City – Ball State vs Minnesota
Meineke Car Care – UNC vs West Virginia
Champs Sports – Miami vs Iowa
Emerald – Maryland vs San Jose State*
Independence – LaTech* vs U La-La*
Papajohns.com – Pitt vs Arkansas State*
Alamo – Northwestern vs Oklahoma State
Humanitarian – Boise State vs Wake Forest
Texas – Northern Illinois* vs Rice
Holiday – Cal vs Missouri
Armed Forces – Air Force vs Tulsa
Sun – Oregon vs Notre Dame**
Music City – Kentucky vs VaTech
Insight – Wisconsin vs Kansas
Peach/Chick-fil-A – LSU vs Georgia Tech
Outback – Michigan State vs South Carolina
Capital One – Ohio State vs Georgia
Gator – Florida State vs Nebraska
Cotton – Texas Tech vs Ole Miss
Liberty – Houston vs Vandy
International – UConn vs Buffalo
GMAC – ECU vs Central Michigan
* At large teams shown with asterisk when partner conference aren’t projected to have enough eligible teams.
** Yeah, I know. I said ND was a lock for the Gator. They suck and so do I.
The full list of college football bowl games is online.
© www.fanblogs.com
The latest installment of the NCAA’s Graduation Success Rate reports have been released for 2008.
The Graduation Success Rate measures how many players earned a four-year degree within a six-year window, accounting for both transfers into the footabll program as well as transfers out of the football program.
So how do the BCS schools stack up against one another? I’m glad you asked.
2008 NCAA Graduation Success Rate for BCS Football Programs
1. Notre Dame 94%
2. Stanford 93
T3. BC 92
T3. Duke 92
T3. Northwestern 92
6. Vanderbilt 91
7. Wake Forest 83
8. Texas Tech 79
T9. Baylor 78
T9. Nebraska 78
T9. UNC 78
T9. Penn State 78
T13. UConn 77
T13. Indiana 77
T15. Colorado 75
T15. Iowa 75
T15. Syracuse 75
T15. Virginia Tech 75
19. Cincinnati 73
T20. Illinois 70
T20. Michigan 70
T20. Miami 70
T20. Rutgers 70
24. Florida State 69
T25. Clemson 68
T25. Florida 68
T25. Maryland 68
T25. Wash State 68
…………………………………..
T29. Kansas State 67
T29. Pitt 67
31. Virginia 66
T32. South Carolina 65
T32. Washington 65
T34. Oregon State 64
T34. Ole Miss 63
T34. Miss State 63
T34. Purdue 63
T34. West Virginia 63
T34. Wisconsin 63
T40. Okla State 62
T40. UCLA 62
42. Arizona State 60
T43. N.C. State 59
T43. Missouri 59
45. Louisville 58
46. Auburn 57
T47. Kentucky 56
T47. Texas A&M 56
T47. South Florida 56
T50. Alabama 55
T50. Iowa State 55
T52. LSU 54
T52. Tennessee 54
T52. USC 54
T55. Cal 53
T55. Oregon 53
T55. Kansas 53
58. Ohio State 52
T58. Arkansas 52
T60. Minnesota 51
T60. Michigan State 51
62. Texas 50
T63. Georgia 48
T63. Georgia Tech 48
65. Oklahoma 46
66. Arizona 41
I wasn’t surprised to see some of the finest academic institutions grabbing the top spots, but I was SHOCKED to see Texas Tech at #8. Kudos to the Red Raiders!
The average GSR scores of the six BCS conferences:
1. ACC……..72.3
2. Big East…67.4
3. Big Ten….66
4. Big 12…..63.2
5. Pac-10…..61.3
6. SEC………60.5
For all the blustering about the Pac10’s high academic standards, I would have expected one of those standards to be…. graduation.
© www.fanblogs.com

